Just stumbled across McSweeney’s Open Letter to Cambridge University Press, Regarding Odor. For the uninitiated, these are usually letters addressed “To People Or Entities Who Are Unlikely Respond.” Well, Benjamin, we love you starving college students and we can take a hint. Apologies for the offense to your olfaction… hope the exam went well regardless!
Read MoreWelcome back Sadhika!!! News from the frontlines of motherhood by one of Cambridge’s favorite publicists - a guest post - on her beautiful baby girl and the big bad return to work.
Read MoreWith the rising popularity of print-on-demand (POD) publishing, The Economist considers the impact of new technology on our industry. As the power of print becomes the power to press print, will POD prove a boon or a burden for publishing’s supply chain?
Read MoreJust a quick note of farewell as I move on to Pittsburgh, departing Cambridge after 3 lovely years. Thanks to Cambridge for a great environment, and to you, authors and readers, for your responsiveness and good ideas. Don't worry, the blog will be in good hands with Caitlin. -Jonathan
Read MoreThe New York Times reports on a Penn-Wharton School study of what makes an article get shared most, or go “viral.” The results are surprising and refreshing. Apparently, you guys like science! Read it!>>
Read MoreThe holidays approach. There won’t be any updates until the new year. In the meantime, happy holidays, everyone!
Read MoreFinally, someone went and scientifically analyzed that “old book” smell that we in publishing love so much. Thanks, Britain! Read more at UPI >>
Read More